In his book, Raw Materials for the Mind, author David Warlick says,
Perhaps a useful looking glass through which to examine this time of change and its impact on our schools is to examine the evolution of our economic systems. It is largely economic systems that determine how people spend their time — what they do from hour to hour and day to day and what skills they need to contribute to their system — and preparing students for these activities is what education is all about.
At first reading, this really goes against my basic beliefs about education. I call preparing a student for a job, training. Education is about so much more than that. Education is about analyzing problems, finding solutions, producing, preventing big problems, but not just on the assembly line. Education deals with deciding if whatever is being produced should be, if raw materials should be gathered or not, if that much more carbon needs to be sent into the atmosphere, or if it comes to a question of profit versus morality, education is needed to see the difference.
No one seems to be sure what we should be preparing students for. In this week’s report “Diplomas Count: Ready for What?” which can be found in the online version of Education Week for June 6, 2007, we are told, “There is plenty of confusion about what it means to fully prepare students for life after high school.” This report contains statistics on jobs and wages in every state in the nation. According to the article, ”Eleven states report that they have adopted a definition of ‘college readiness’ , …Twenty-one states report they have a definition of ‘work readiness’….” I see no evidence that any two of these states agree.
The first report released by the Commission on the Skills of the American Workforce in 1990 was America’s Choice: high skills or low wages! The report indicated that because of globalization, we would have to go for the high skills jobs if Americans wanted to maitain our standard of living. That commission did not foresee that we would be competing with countries that would offer highly skilled workers at low wages. Consequently the new report by this commission, Tough choices or tough Times, advocates a complete overhaul of the American educational system . This report describes the “most competent” employee of the twenty-first century–the one for which employers all over the world will be seeking as someone having “strong skills in English, mathematics, technology, and science, as well as literature, history, and the arts…[C]andidates will have to be comfortable with ideas and abstractions, good at both analysis and synthesis, creative and innovative…” etc. etc. etc.
It seems to me that the requirements for “real” education have not changed so much as the fact that if America is to be a financial or any other kind of power in the twenty-first century, we must stop allowing our educational system remain at the bottom of our list of priorities. A reading of Tough choices or tough Times will cause many educators to dream and dismiss it with an “Oh, but it will never happen.” What we must realize is that if this does not happen, our grandchildren may well be the citizens of a poor, third world country.
In conclusion, Warlick is only partially correct. We cannot, however, be successful by teaching only some students more technology. All the educational requirements for twenty-first century success must become our national passion!